The high cost of cheap drugs The centre has withdrawn its directive making the prescription of generic drugs mandatory—but only after raising the hackles of the medical community Listen to Story Live TV Share ADVERTISEMENT Illustration by Nilanjan Das Sonali Acharjee Sonali Acharjee ISSUE DATE: Sep 11, 2023 | UPDATED: Sep 1, 2023 20:15 IST For now, a medical row has been put to rest. The National Medical Commission (NMC), the regulatory body guiding medical professionals, has put on hold its order requiring doctors to exclusively prescribe non-branded generic medicines to patients. The NMC’s about-turn followed a meeting on August 21 at which representatives of the Indian Medical Association (IMA) spoke to the Union health minister Mansukh Mandaviya and expressed their apprehension about the quality of unbranded generics. This brought to an end a heated and nearly month-long debate between doctors and the government. However, the very possibility of such a directive coming into force has left many doctors shaken. Generic medicines are drugs that are not under patent, which means manufacturers other than the ones that came up with the medicine are able to produce it. According to NMC guidelines, a generic drug is one that is the same as a branded one in dosage form, strength, route of administration, quality and performance characteristics and intended use. There are two types of generic drugs—branded and non-branded. Branded generics are cheaper than patented medicine but more expensive than non-branded generic medicine. For example, Crocin and Dolo 650 are branded generic medicines for pain and fever. Paracetamol is the non-branded generic medicine for the same, and any company can make it. ADVERTISEMENT The August 2 fiat to determinedly push unbranded generic medicines wasn’t an isolated move. In May 2023, there were talks of passing a generic drug mandate for private hospitals as well. The rationale behind the NMC guideline was to reduce healthcare costs. Currently, the World Health Organization estimates, nearly 55 million Indians are pushed into poverty annually due to out-of-pocket expenditure on healthcare, especially for medicines. By promoting generic medicines—which are often 30 per cent to 80 per cent cheaper than their branded equivalents—the NMC hopes to reduce the cost of treatment in the country. The now-withdrawn NMC guideline also asked doctors to encourage patients to purchase medicines from government-run Jan Aushadhi Kendras and other generic pharmacy outlets. India is the world’s largest producer and exporter of generic drugs, with med­­icines worth over ã17 billion (Rs 1.76 lakh crore) exported last year. Not trusted by doctors Non-branded generic drugs are yet to win the confidence of doctors. Most say that the effectiveness and reliability of such medicines are hard to ascertain due to a lack of batch testing and the prevalence of haphazard approval pro­cedures. “There are thousands of small firms who manufacture the same salt as a branded medicine but these com­pletely lack infrastructure and tec­­hnical knowhow for quality control and testing. If every single batch of an unbranded generic was tested, the way branded ones are, then that instils faith,” says IMA president Dr Sharad Kumar. According to data from the Union ministry of chemicals and fertilisers, India produces over 60,000 gen­eric drugs across 60 therapeutic categories, manufactured by 3,000 firms in over 10,500 units. However, there is no current data showing the number of small units producing generic medicine. But, according to T.V. Narayana, president of Indian Pharmaceutical Association, the rise of e-pharmacies has significantly inflated the figure. “There is tremendous potential for pharmaceutical manufacturing in India. And the demand for India-made generics is high. But as supply increases it is important to enforce regular quality and compliance checks regardless of company size,” he says. According to IMA estimates, less than 0.1 per cent of generic drugs in India are tested for quality. In 2018, the Central Drug Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) estimated that nearly 4.5 per cent of all generic drugs circulated in the domestic market were substandard. Poor quality medicines from India have been making global headlines. In 2022, 65 child deaths were linked to contaminated cough syrup made in India by a company called Marion Biotech. In August, the WHO issued a global alert about an Indian-made cold syrup called Cold Out, which is sold in Iraq. “I would not prescribe unbranded medicine to my family. There are many of highly dubious quality and others that don’t even work. How can I be forced to do so for patients?” says a doctor from a leading government hospital in Delhi, who does not wish to be named. ADVERTISEMENT Doctors are also outraged at what they perceive is a shift in decision-making power from physicians to pharmacists. By simply writing the generic name on a prescription, they are allowing pharmacists to decide which company’s unbranded generic drug the patient should take. “Treatment is not as straightforward as that—we need to take into account side-effects, medical history, allergies etc. before prescribing a drug. How can the NMC decide that the best person to determine which medicine a patient should take is a chemist?” asks Dr Kumar. In the event that an unbranded medicine fails to have an effect, or worse, has serious side-effects, doctors are worried about their reputation as well as violence from affected patients and their family. “Violence against doctors is a serious issue. I have had experience of patients, spouses or children being aggressive,” says Dr Ashutosh Sen, a general physician from Kolkata. “If I face the liability of my prescription, then I must also be allowed to prescribe a drug of my choice. Suppose the chemist prescribes a medicine from a brand that is not good quality and anything happens to a patient...my head will be on the chopping block,” he adds. ADVERTISEMENT Proponents of generic drugs point to the alleged role of big pharma in pressuring doctors to prescribe branded medicines. “This has never been proven and if the public starts to regard doctors as money-makers alone, there will be severe consequences. As doctors, we are under oath to save lives and that is our only mandate,” says Dr Kumar. ADVERTISEMENT What should be done In the August 21 meeting with Manda­viya, one of the proposals was to reduce the prices of branded generic medicines. “Reduction of tax can help reduce prices of branded generics. There should be rules to ensure quality, distribution and chemist regulation. We feel that the approach should be more flexible, allowing the doctor’s judgem­ent to prevail,” says Dr Girish Mathur, president, Association of Physicians in India. Finally, the government has begun to take steps to improve the quality of med­ical manufacturing. Of India’s 10,500 medicine manufacturing units, around 8,500 are in the MSME category. Only 2,000 units in this category have WHO GMP (good manufacturing practice) certification. Quality control for these come under Schedule M of the Drugs Rules, 1945, which govern production units and their maintenance, personnel, control and safety testing, storage and transport of material, wri­tten procedures and tra­­ceability. Last month, drug regulators inspected 162 units and 14 public testing labs and found lapses such as lack of process and analytical validations, abse­nce of quality failure investigation and internal quality review, as well as faulty design of manufacturing and testing areas. Based on these, GMP recommendations in the current Schedule M have been revised to reflect globally-accepted standards. Pharma companies with an annual turnover of over Rs 250 crore will have to adopt GMP recommendations in the next six months. Units with a turnover under that have been given an additional six months to comply. The government is also trying to ensure quality control of around 1,800 unbranded generics sold at its 9,600 Jan Aushadhi stores. “We do third-party and anonymous testing for our batches and only source from WHO GMP-certified firms after inspecting their facilities,” says Jan Aushadhi CEO Ravi Dadhich. “The batches are tested for permissible impurities, hardness, dissolution levels and effectiveness.” The chain has only four warehouses that supply all its stores, thereby ensuring each store keeps approved medicine. “In the last nine years, we have saved Rs 20,000 crore for Indians, with Rs 7,000 crore saved last year alone,” says Dadhich. He insists Jan Aushadhi can supply quality medicine at the most affordable price (at times, almost 90 per cent less than branded generics) with virtually no risk of adulteration or tampering. Ultimately, say experts, the goal should be to make healthcare more affordable without compromising on quality of drugs. For this, reduction in taxation, more economical manufacturing infrastructure and stringent monitoring of all processes will yield better results than to compel doctors to relinquish crucial decision-making power and prescribe only a certain type of medicine. EDITED BY SUDHANVA AYURVEDA OVERSEAS PVT LTD.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DONALD TRUMP LATEST NEWS TODAY:Jen Psaki Busts Republican Reason For Gun Violence As 'Big Cop Out' Trump Biographer Thinks He Just Threw Eric Trump ‘Under The Bus’ POLITICS DONALD TRUMP JOE BIDEN 2024 Election GOP Governor Makes Surprise Prediction About Trump And Biden In 2024 New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu said a 2020 rematch "is not what America wants." ben blanchet New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R) isn't ruling out the possibility that both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump won't appear on the ballot in 2024. (You can check out his comments in the clip below) “It's not going to be that way. Look, I think there's a good shot that neither of them are actually on that ballot," Sununu said on Sunday's edition of "Meet the Press." Advertisement “I think Trump can lose very much if they winnow it down to one-on-one. I think there's a lot of issues that are going to come to bear with President Biden over the next year and a lot of opportunity for the Democrats to find another, another candidate." Sununu's comments follow a recent poll that suggests 75% and 69% of U.S. adults wouldn't like to see either Biden or Trump, respectively, run for president. “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd, earlier in the interview, asked the governor whether he supports the No Labels political organization putting up their own candidate on the ballot next year. “Well, look, according to the polls you just showed about 70% of America is supportive of that idea to not see Trump and Biden on that ticket,” Sununu said. “I heard someone put it once, '70% of America, if it's a Trump-Biden ticket, will be politically homeless.' And I think that's a very good way to put it. They won't have any inspiration. They won't feel very confident about going forward…" The governor, a Trump critic who turned down a possible GOP presidential campaign, later declared that No Labels has an opportunity in the election "like never before." “It would have to be the right candidate. It would have to be someone very energizing, positive, transparent, someone with a good record," he said. Sununu, when asked whether another Biden term or another Trump term concerns him more, pointed to his concerns with having both on the ticket. “I think you're bringing up the exact right point: This is not what America wants,” Sununu told Todd. “It doesn't mean our primary system is broken. It means more of us have to be engaged in the system to make sure that our voice is heard as that 70% of Americans who always want to look forward. With Biden and Trump, all you're doing is looking backwards and re-litigating a lot of drama. Nobody wants that. RELATED DONALD TRUMP JOE BIDEN 2024 Election MEET THE PRESS CHRIS SUNUNU George Stephanopoulos Shocked By New Trump-Biden Poll George Stephanopoulos Grills Vivek Ramaswamy Over Trump Sympathy GOP Senator Says 'We Don't Know' If Trump Could Beat Biden In 2024

DONALD TRUMP NEWS:POLITICS DONALD TRUMP GLENN KIRSCHNER Ex-Prosecutor Sounds The Alarm On Trump's 'Demonstrated Danger' To Witnesses, Jurors Glenn Kirschner broke down over his concern that judges haven't "stepped up to address" the threat of the former president. Glenn Kirschner — a former U.S. Army prosecutor and current MSNBC legal analyst — warned of the threat Donald Trump poses to witnesses and jurors in his four ongoing indictments as he declared that the former president is a "danger." “I am concerned that the judges have not yet stepped up to address the danger, the ongoing danger, the demonstrated danger of Donald Trump to witnesses, to jurors, to prosecutors, to judges and to their families,” Kirschner told SiriusXM host Dean Obeidallah. in an interview shared Friday. Advertisement “I hope at some point the judges realize that Donald Trump is a danger to the community and he should be detained pending trial because that will begin to neutralize the threat, in part because you'll take his megaphone away. I think we're going to be having that conversation in the months to come," he added. Kirschner's remarks follow several instances where Trump has hurled social media attacks at prosecutors including special counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, New York Attorney General Letitia James and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. In August, Georgia officials said they're investigating threats made to grand jurors who indicted Trump and 18 others. Obeidallah asked the ex-federal prosecutor whether Trump "eclipse[s] the concerns" he has had toward people he has tried in past cases. Advertisement Before discussing Trump, Kirschner described dealing with a criminal organization that he tied to 30 killings where there was an anonymous jury and other security measures in place due to the "danger" posed by the group. “And guess what? They still got to some of the jurors and some of the jurors had to be dismissed midtrial," said Kirschner, adding that he's tried cases with the "most rigorous security measures" in Washington. “I have an even graver concern for Donald Trump because his reach is so broad, his followers are so rabid at times and so detached from reality. I'm sorry, this is a cult,” he said.

DONALD TRUMP NEWS ELECTION 2024:POLITICS DONALD TRUMP 2024 Election ADAM SCHIFF Adam Schiff: Disqualifying Trump Could Be 'Legitimate Issue' In 2024 Election Schiff said there is a "valid argument" for keeping Donald Trump off the ballot next year. The video player is currently playing an ad. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) thinks there are serious questions about whether Donald Trump is even eligible for the office of president. On Sunday, the California congressman said that there is “pretty clear” evidence Trump is in violation of the 14th Amendment’s third section, which blocks anyone who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from serving in elected office. ADVERTISEMENT Schiff explained why there is a “valid argument” for keeping Trump off the ballot while appearing on MSNBC following earlier reports that election officials across the U.S. are bracing themselves for legal challenges to Trump’s 2024 presidential candidacy. “If you engage in acts of insurrection or rebellion against the government, or you give aid and comfort to those who do, you are disqualified from running,” Schiff told host Jen Psaki. Donald Trump speaks to the media after being booked at the Fulton County jail in Atlanta, Georgia, on Aug. 24. Donald Trump speaks to the media after being booked at the Fulton County jail in Atlanta, Georgia, on Aug. 24. JOE RAEDLE VIA GETTY IMAGES “It doesn't require that you be convicted of insurrection. It just requires that you have engaged in these acts," he continued, later adding how that definition "fits Donald Trump to a T." Trump has been accused of inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, riots with his claims of a stolen 2020 presidential election. He is currently facing multiple criminal charges over his actions leading up to and during the attacks on the U.S. capital. Schiff said any case against the former president would still face major legal scrutiny, telling Psaki how any 14th Amendment-based challenges to Trump’s candidacy would likely end up in the Supreme Court, which currently holds a 6-3 conservative majority. Rep. Adam Schiff speaks as the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. The Capitol holds its final meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2022. Rep. Adam Schiff speaks as the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. The Capitol holds its final meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2022. JACQUELYN MARTIN VIA THE ASSOCIATED PRESS "That's the big question mark through all of this," the congressman said. “Which is what will the Supreme Court do?” “There are prominent constitutional scholars, as well as prominent progressive scholars who believe that he should be disqualified,” Schiff went on. ADVERTISEMENT “But, will the court take that step ultimately? Only time will tell, but I do think it is a very legitimate issue. By the clear terms of the 14th Amendment, he should be disqualified from holding office." This weekend Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) made a similar case during an appearance on ABC “This Week,” telling anchor George Stephanopoulos there’s a “powerful argument to be made” for invoking the 14th Amendment. “In my view, the attack on the Capitol that day was designed for a particular purpose at a particular moment,” Kaine said. “And that was to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power as is laid out in the Constitution. So I think there’s a powerful argument to be made.” RELATED:Donald Trump NEWS