STYLE & BEAUTY FASHION collaboration BEAUTY How Much Money Fashion And Beauty Bloggers Earn Per Post You may think Instagrammers are raking in all the cash, but blogging often pays much more. By Sudhanva Ayurveda Overseas Pvt Ltd When most people think of influencers, they picture sponsored grid posts and stories on Instagram. We all know that influencers make money from sponsored grid posts and Instagram stories, but what about good old-fashioned bloggers? Are they still bringing in money for their content? And now that the coronavirus pandemic has changed the landscape of digital influencing, how has the blogging world changed? Advertisement Even though traditional blogging may not be as popular as it was a decade ago, it's still an extremely lucrative way for influencers and content creators to make money — sometimes even more so than sponsored content on Instagram. Mackenzie Newcomb is an influencer marketing manager for Traackr who works with brands to provide data on how much the brand should pay influencers, based on the quality of their audience. Newcomb also worked directly with influencers in past roles. “From my experience working at a gourmet food company, most Instagram influencers asked for $1k-$2k per every 100k followers they had. There would be variations, for those who had extremely good engagement or outstanding photography skills that could be leveraged for marketing resources,” Newcomb said. “I found that blog posts almost always paid 50% to 100% more than standard in-feed posts, due to the amount of labor.” Because blog posts almost always require more copy and more images than Instagram posts, blogs offer influencers an opportunity to bump up the overall rate for a collaboration. And blog posts rarely exist on their own — usually, a blog post is part of a collaboration that includes an Instagram grid post or story, as well. Unlike Instagram content, though, blog posts also come with the opportunity to attract a large audience through SEO. And unlike follower counts, organic SEO traffic is much harder to fake. Advertisement So exactly what goes into a sponsored blog post? And how much money are content creators making from them? We spoke to five influencers and bloggers with audiences of all sizes to find out how things worked both pre-coronavirus and now, after things have started to change. The influencers below didn't name the brands that paid them for their work. Paris S.Chanel (@thebirthofparisc, The Rebirth of Paris C) Paris Chanel is a Memphis, Tennessee-based influencer and blogger who covers topics ranging from fashion and beauty to lifestyle and tech. Like many successful influencers these days, her content covers a bit of everything. And though she's only been blogging for two years, she's already built up a substantial and engaged audience. Brand category: Fashion Deliverables: “The client sent me five outfits that I could choose from and style to make my own. They wanted me to create some fashion content for their clothes and created a special link for each piece that I could promote to my followers. My deliverables to them were: a 300-500 word temporary 2-week blog post, 3 consecutive permanent Instagram posts and 5 swipe-up Instagram stories with outfit breakdowns. They were so pleased with the content quality that they booked me again for a swimwear campaign that I created video content for.” What she was initially offered: $500 What she was paid in the end: $1,500 Expenses associated with this collaboration: “I had to purchase the accessories to complete the outfits that they sent. They only sent clothing. I am all about presenting a great final product, so in order for my vision to come into fruition, I needed to have all accessories from that company to effectively show followers that it is a one-stop shop for all fashion needs. I calculated all of that into my price. I also had to hire a photographer for this one. When I am working on higher-paid projects, hiring a professional is a must for me. Quality is key. Advertisement Exclusivity: This campaign did not contain any exclusivity or in perpetuity rights. How long did the post need to stay live: Two weeks Turnaround time: Three weeks Her POV: “Influencers and bloggers most definitely need to take the time out to research and study before just hopping into this field. I have had many huge brands that I know for a fact make enough money to pay influencers still try to get over on me with not wanting to pay me, or pay me less than my worth. Make sure that you are reading every single line of the contractual agreements sent to you. Being knowledgeable is highly important. Be sure to send thank you letters to previous clients that booked you. Do not be afraid to follow up 3-6 months later if you haven't heard from them again to see if they have any upcoming projects that you can work with them on. Reach out to the PR and

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DONALD TRUMP LATEST NEWS TODAY:Jen Psaki Busts Republican Reason For Gun Violence As 'Big Cop Out' Trump Biographer Thinks He Just Threw Eric Trump ‘Under The Bus’ POLITICS DONALD TRUMP JOE BIDEN 2024 Election GOP Governor Makes Surprise Prediction About Trump And Biden In 2024 New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu said a 2020 rematch "is not what America wants." ben blanchet New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R) isn't ruling out the possibility that both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump won't appear on the ballot in 2024. (You can check out his comments in the clip below) “It's not going to be that way. Look, I think there's a good shot that neither of them are actually on that ballot," Sununu said on Sunday's edition of "Meet the Press." Advertisement “I think Trump can lose very much if they winnow it down to one-on-one. I think there's a lot of issues that are going to come to bear with President Biden over the next year and a lot of opportunity for the Democrats to find another, another candidate." Sununu's comments follow a recent poll that suggests 75% and 69% of U.S. adults wouldn't like to see either Biden or Trump, respectively, run for president. “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd, earlier in the interview, asked the governor whether he supports the No Labels political organization putting up their own candidate on the ballot next year. “Well, look, according to the polls you just showed about 70% of America is supportive of that idea to not see Trump and Biden on that ticket,” Sununu said. “I heard someone put it once, '70% of America, if it's a Trump-Biden ticket, will be politically homeless.' And I think that's a very good way to put it. They won't have any inspiration. They won't feel very confident about going forward…" The governor, a Trump critic who turned down a possible GOP presidential campaign, later declared that No Labels has an opportunity in the election "like never before." “It would have to be the right candidate. It would have to be someone very energizing, positive, transparent, someone with a good record," he said. Sununu, when asked whether another Biden term or another Trump term concerns him more, pointed to his concerns with having both on the ticket. “I think you're bringing up the exact right point: This is not what America wants,” Sununu told Todd. “It doesn't mean our primary system is broken. It means more of us have to be engaged in the system to make sure that our voice is heard as that 70% of Americans who always want to look forward. With Biden and Trump, all you're doing is looking backwards and re-litigating a lot of drama. Nobody wants that. RELATED DONALD TRUMP JOE BIDEN 2024 Election MEET THE PRESS CHRIS SUNUNU George Stephanopoulos Shocked By New Trump-Biden Poll George Stephanopoulos Grills Vivek Ramaswamy Over Trump Sympathy GOP Senator Says 'We Don't Know' If Trump Could Beat Biden In 2024

DONALD TRUMP NEWS:POLITICS DONALD TRUMP GLENN KIRSCHNER Ex-Prosecutor Sounds The Alarm On Trump's 'Demonstrated Danger' To Witnesses, Jurors Glenn Kirschner broke down over his concern that judges haven't "stepped up to address" the threat of the former president. Glenn Kirschner — a former U.S. Army prosecutor and current MSNBC legal analyst — warned of the threat Donald Trump poses to witnesses and jurors in his four ongoing indictments as he declared that the former president is a "danger." “I am concerned that the judges have not yet stepped up to address the danger, the ongoing danger, the demonstrated danger of Donald Trump to witnesses, to jurors, to prosecutors, to judges and to their families,” Kirschner told SiriusXM host Dean Obeidallah. in an interview shared Friday. Advertisement “I hope at some point the judges realize that Donald Trump is a danger to the community and he should be detained pending trial because that will begin to neutralize the threat, in part because you'll take his megaphone away. I think we're going to be having that conversation in the months to come," he added. Kirschner's remarks follow several instances where Trump has hurled social media attacks at prosecutors including special counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, New York Attorney General Letitia James and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. In August, Georgia officials said they're investigating threats made to grand jurors who indicted Trump and 18 others. Obeidallah asked the ex-federal prosecutor whether Trump "eclipse[s] the concerns" he has had toward people he has tried in past cases. Advertisement Before discussing Trump, Kirschner described dealing with a criminal organization that he tied to 30 killings where there was an anonymous jury and other security measures in place due to the "danger" posed by the group. “And guess what? They still got to some of the jurors and some of the jurors had to be dismissed midtrial," said Kirschner, adding that he's tried cases with the "most rigorous security measures" in Washington. “I have an even graver concern for Donald Trump because his reach is so broad, his followers are so rabid at times and so detached from reality. I'm sorry, this is a cult,” he said.

DONALD TRUMP NEWS ELECTION 2024:POLITICS DONALD TRUMP 2024 Election ADAM SCHIFF Adam Schiff: Disqualifying Trump Could Be 'Legitimate Issue' In 2024 Election Schiff said there is a "valid argument" for keeping Donald Trump off the ballot next year. The video player is currently playing an ad. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) thinks there are serious questions about whether Donald Trump is even eligible for the office of president. On Sunday, the California congressman said that there is “pretty clear” evidence Trump is in violation of the 14th Amendment’s third section, which blocks anyone who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from serving in elected office. ADVERTISEMENT Schiff explained why there is a “valid argument” for keeping Trump off the ballot while appearing on MSNBC following earlier reports that election officials across the U.S. are bracing themselves for legal challenges to Trump’s 2024 presidential candidacy. “If you engage in acts of insurrection or rebellion against the government, or you give aid and comfort to those who do, you are disqualified from running,” Schiff told host Jen Psaki. Donald Trump speaks to the media after being booked at the Fulton County jail in Atlanta, Georgia, on Aug. 24. Donald Trump speaks to the media after being booked at the Fulton County jail in Atlanta, Georgia, on Aug. 24. JOE RAEDLE VIA GETTY IMAGES “It doesn't require that you be convicted of insurrection. It just requires that you have engaged in these acts," he continued, later adding how that definition "fits Donald Trump to a T." Trump has been accused of inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, riots with his claims of a stolen 2020 presidential election. He is currently facing multiple criminal charges over his actions leading up to and during the attacks on the U.S. capital. Schiff said any case against the former president would still face major legal scrutiny, telling Psaki how any 14th Amendment-based challenges to Trump’s candidacy would likely end up in the Supreme Court, which currently holds a 6-3 conservative majority. Rep. Adam Schiff speaks as the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. The Capitol holds its final meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2022. Rep. Adam Schiff speaks as the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. The Capitol holds its final meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2022. JACQUELYN MARTIN VIA THE ASSOCIATED PRESS "That's the big question mark through all of this," the congressman said. “Which is what will the Supreme Court do?” “There are prominent constitutional scholars, as well as prominent progressive scholars who believe that he should be disqualified,” Schiff went on. ADVERTISEMENT “But, will the court take that step ultimately? Only time will tell, but I do think it is a very legitimate issue. By the clear terms of the 14th Amendment, he should be disqualified from holding office." This weekend Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) made a similar case during an appearance on ABC “This Week,” telling anchor George Stephanopoulos there’s a “powerful argument to be made” for invoking the 14th Amendment. “In my view, the attack on the Capitol that day was designed for a particular purpose at a particular moment,” Kaine said. “And that was to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power as is laid out in the Constitution. So I think there’s a powerful argument to be made.” RELATED:Donald Trump NEWS