In Short OCCRP report names Nasser Ali Shaban Ahli and Chang Chung-Ling The two men spent years trading Adani stocks worth millions of dollars, claims report Both have close ties to the Adani family, said OCCRP A report published by the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) on August 31 named two men, claiming that they spent years trading hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Adani Group stocks. They are Nasser Ali Shaban Ahli and Chang Chung-Ling. The report, which has been strongly rejected by the Adani Group, alleged that the two men “secretly invested in the massive conglomerate”, adding that they have close ties to its majority owners, the Adani family. ADVERTISEMENT “The two men, Nasser Ali Shaban Ahli and Chang Chung-Ling have longtime business ties to the family and have also served as directors and shareholders in Adani Group companies and companies associated with one of the family’s senior members, Vinod Adani,” the report added. 50 MUST READ Fan gets injured after Rapper 50 Cent throws mic into crowd at US concert TRENDING TOPICS: Chandrayaan-3 INDIA Bloc Meet Asia Cup Points Table Binge Watch Guide Article 370 Hearing OCCRP, a global network of investigative journalists focused on exposing corruption, said hundreds of millions of dollars were invested in publicly traded Adani stock through “opaque investment funds” based in Mauritius. Who are Nasser Ali Shaban Ahli and Chang Chung-Ling? Nasser Ali Shaban Ahli from the United Arab Emirates and Chang Chung-Ling from Taiwan have been named in the OCCRP report as associates of Vinod Adani, the elder brother of billionaire and Adani Group founder Gautam Adani. The OCCRP report, citing documents it has accessed, said the two associates spent years “buying and selling Adani stock” through offshore structures that obscured their involvement and made considerable profits in the process. “They also show that the management company in charge of their investments paid a Vinod Adani company to advise them in their investments,” the OCCRP report added. Two destination funds linked to them were also named in the report – Mauritius-based investment funds Emerging India Focus Fund (EIFF) and EM Resurgent Fund (EMRF). Citing documents, OCCRP said, “A large percentage of the money was placed into these funds by two foreign investors — Chang from Taiwan and Ahli from the United Arab Emirates — who used them to trade large amounts of shares in four Adani companies between 2013 and 2018.” “At one point in March 2017, the value of the investments in Adani Group stock was $430 million,” the OCCRP report noted. OCCRP went on to add that the money followed a “convoluted trail”, making it difficult to follow. But it was channeled through four companies and a Bermuda-based investment fund called the Global Opportunities Fund (GOF). The four companies that were used for the investments in EIFF and EMRF were: The Gulf Arij Trading FZE in UAE, owned by Ahli; Lingo Investment Ltd owned by Chang; Mid East Ocean Trade (Mauritius), of which Ahli was the beneficial owner and Gulf Asia Trade & Investment Ltd (BVI), of which Ahli was the “controlling person”. ADVERTISEMENT OCCRP claimed that these investments resulted in significant profits worth hundreds of millions over the years as EIFF and EMRF “repeatedly bought Adani stock” for a lower price and sold it at a high. “Between them, at the peak of their investment in June 2016, the two funds held free-floating shares of four Adani Group companies ranging from 8 to nearly 14 percent: Adani Power, Adani Enterprises, Adani Ports, and Adani Transmissions,” the OCCRP report said. Past involvement Both Chang and Ahli were individuals with established connections to the Adani family, said the OCCRP report, adding that they found themselves entangled in two separate government investigations over the years. The first case, dating back to 2007, involved their alleged involvement in an illicit diamond trading scheme investigated by India's Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). In this case, Chang was identified as the director of three Adani-affiliated companies implicated in the scheme, while Ahli represented a trading firm also linked to the wrongdoing. Notably, Chang shared a residential address in Singapore with Vinod Adani. ADVERTISEMENT Meanwhile, the second case from 2014 revolved around an alleged over-invoicing scam uncovered by the DRI. This investigation revealed that Adani Group companies were purportedly channeling funds out of India by inflating payments to their foreign subsidiaries, potentially amounting to as much as $1 billion for imported power generation equipment. Once again, Chang and Ahli featured prominently as they served as directors of two companies, one based in the UAE and another in Mauritius, which handled the proceeds from this scheme, both later owned by Vinod Adani. Additionally, Chang's involvement extended to a Singapore company listed as a "related party" in a disclosure by an Adani entity, as highlighted in the Hindenburg report. “Aside from these past links to the Adanis, there is evidence that Chang and Ahli’s trading in Adani stock was coordinated with the family,” the OCCRP report said. Chang and Ahli’s role Quoting an anonymous source familiar with the Adani Group’s businesses, the report highlighted that “The fund managers in charge of Chang and Ahli’s investments in EIFF and EMRF received direct instructions on the investments from an Adani company”. ADVERTISEMENT Excel Investment and Advisory Services Limited, the company named by the OCCRP source, is based in a secretive offshore zone in the United Arab Emirates where corporate records are not available. While the OCCRP report said there's no direct proof linking Chang and Ahli's Adani Group investments to the Adani family's funds, documents obtained by the organisation indicated that Vinod Adani utilised a Mauritius-based fund for his own investments. Ahli and Chang have not yet commented on the report. However, in an interview with The Guardian, Chang Chung-Ling denied knowledge of any secret purchases of Adani stock.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DONALD TRUMP LATEST NEWS TODAY:Jen Psaki Busts Republican Reason For Gun Violence As 'Big Cop Out' Trump Biographer Thinks He Just Threw Eric Trump ‘Under The Bus’ POLITICS DONALD TRUMP JOE BIDEN 2024 Election GOP Governor Makes Surprise Prediction About Trump And Biden In 2024 New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu said a 2020 rematch "is not what America wants." ben blanchet New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu (R) isn't ruling out the possibility that both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump won't appear on the ballot in 2024. (You can check out his comments in the clip below) “It's not going to be that way. Look, I think there's a good shot that neither of them are actually on that ballot," Sununu said on Sunday's edition of "Meet the Press." Advertisement “I think Trump can lose very much if they winnow it down to one-on-one. I think there's a lot of issues that are going to come to bear with President Biden over the next year and a lot of opportunity for the Democrats to find another, another candidate." Sununu's comments follow a recent poll that suggests 75% and 69% of U.S. adults wouldn't like to see either Biden or Trump, respectively, run for president. “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd, earlier in the interview, asked the governor whether he supports the No Labels political organization putting up their own candidate on the ballot next year. “Well, look, according to the polls you just showed about 70% of America is supportive of that idea to not see Trump and Biden on that ticket,” Sununu said. “I heard someone put it once, '70% of America, if it's a Trump-Biden ticket, will be politically homeless.' And I think that's a very good way to put it. They won't have any inspiration. They won't feel very confident about going forward…" The governor, a Trump critic who turned down a possible GOP presidential campaign, later declared that No Labels has an opportunity in the election "like never before." “It would have to be the right candidate. It would have to be someone very energizing, positive, transparent, someone with a good record," he said. Sununu, when asked whether another Biden term or another Trump term concerns him more, pointed to his concerns with having both on the ticket. “I think you're bringing up the exact right point: This is not what America wants,” Sununu told Todd. “It doesn't mean our primary system is broken. It means more of us have to be engaged in the system to make sure that our voice is heard as that 70% of Americans who always want to look forward. With Biden and Trump, all you're doing is looking backwards and re-litigating a lot of drama. Nobody wants that. RELATED DONALD TRUMP JOE BIDEN 2024 Election MEET THE PRESS CHRIS SUNUNU George Stephanopoulos Shocked By New Trump-Biden Poll George Stephanopoulos Grills Vivek Ramaswamy Over Trump Sympathy GOP Senator Says 'We Don't Know' If Trump Could Beat Biden In 2024

DONALD TRUMP NEWS:POLITICS DONALD TRUMP GLENN KIRSCHNER Ex-Prosecutor Sounds The Alarm On Trump's 'Demonstrated Danger' To Witnesses, Jurors Glenn Kirschner broke down over his concern that judges haven't "stepped up to address" the threat of the former president. Glenn Kirschner — a former U.S. Army prosecutor and current MSNBC legal analyst — warned of the threat Donald Trump poses to witnesses and jurors in his four ongoing indictments as he declared that the former president is a "danger." “I am concerned that the judges have not yet stepped up to address the danger, the ongoing danger, the demonstrated danger of Donald Trump to witnesses, to jurors, to prosecutors, to judges and to their families,” Kirschner told SiriusXM host Dean Obeidallah. in an interview shared Friday. Advertisement “I hope at some point the judges realize that Donald Trump is a danger to the community and he should be detained pending trial because that will begin to neutralize the threat, in part because you'll take his megaphone away. I think we're going to be having that conversation in the months to come," he added. Kirschner's remarks follow several instances where Trump has hurled social media attacks at prosecutors including special counsel Jack Smith, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, New York Attorney General Letitia James and Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. In August, Georgia officials said they're investigating threats made to grand jurors who indicted Trump and 18 others. Obeidallah asked the ex-federal prosecutor whether Trump "eclipse[s] the concerns" he has had toward people he has tried in past cases. Advertisement Before discussing Trump, Kirschner described dealing with a criminal organization that he tied to 30 killings where there was an anonymous jury and other security measures in place due to the "danger" posed by the group. “And guess what? They still got to some of the jurors and some of the jurors had to be dismissed midtrial," said Kirschner, adding that he's tried cases with the "most rigorous security measures" in Washington. “I have an even graver concern for Donald Trump because his reach is so broad, his followers are so rabid at times and so detached from reality. I'm sorry, this is a cult,” he said.

DONALD TRUMP NEWS ELECTION 2024:POLITICS DONALD TRUMP 2024 Election ADAM SCHIFF Adam Schiff: Disqualifying Trump Could Be 'Legitimate Issue' In 2024 Election Schiff said there is a "valid argument" for keeping Donald Trump off the ballot next year. The video player is currently playing an ad. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) thinks there are serious questions about whether Donald Trump is even eligible for the office of president. On Sunday, the California congressman said that there is “pretty clear” evidence Trump is in violation of the 14th Amendment’s third section, which blocks anyone who has “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from serving in elected office. ADVERTISEMENT Schiff explained why there is a “valid argument” for keeping Trump off the ballot while appearing on MSNBC following earlier reports that election officials across the U.S. are bracing themselves for legal challenges to Trump’s 2024 presidential candidacy. “If you engage in acts of insurrection or rebellion against the government, or you give aid and comfort to those who do, you are disqualified from running,” Schiff told host Jen Psaki. Donald Trump speaks to the media after being booked at the Fulton County jail in Atlanta, Georgia, on Aug. 24. Donald Trump speaks to the media after being booked at the Fulton County jail in Atlanta, Georgia, on Aug. 24. JOE RAEDLE VIA GETTY IMAGES “It doesn't require that you be convicted of insurrection. It just requires that you have engaged in these acts," he continued, later adding how that definition "fits Donald Trump to a T." Trump has been accused of inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, riots with his claims of a stolen 2020 presidential election. He is currently facing multiple criminal charges over his actions leading up to and during the attacks on the U.S. capital. Schiff said any case against the former president would still face major legal scrutiny, telling Psaki how any 14th Amendment-based challenges to Trump’s candidacy would likely end up in the Supreme Court, which currently holds a 6-3 conservative majority. Rep. Adam Schiff speaks as the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. The Capitol holds its final meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2022. Rep. Adam Schiff speaks as the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. The Capitol holds its final meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 19, 2022. JACQUELYN MARTIN VIA THE ASSOCIATED PRESS "That's the big question mark through all of this," the congressman said. “Which is what will the Supreme Court do?” “There are prominent constitutional scholars, as well as prominent progressive scholars who believe that he should be disqualified,” Schiff went on. ADVERTISEMENT “But, will the court take that step ultimately? Only time will tell, but I do think it is a very legitimate issue. By the clear terms of the 14th Amendment, he should be disqualified from holding office." This weekend Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) made a similar case during an appearance on ABC “This Week,” telling anchor George Stephanopoulos there’s a “powerful argument to be made” for invoking the 14th Amendment. “In my view, the attack on the Capitol that day was designed for a particular purpose at a particular moment,” Kaine said. “And that was to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power as is laid out in the Constitution. So I think there’s a powerful argument to be made.” RELATED:Donald Trump NEWS